Skip to content

Aave V3 guide

Why did my Aave health factor drop when I didn't do anything?

By the Tokenping teamPublished Updated 11 min read

Short answer

Aave recalculates your health factor from oracle prices, your current balances and the current liquidation thresholds every time it is read, so it moves even when you send no transactions. On Aave V3 it falls when your collateral's price drops, the asset you borrowed rises, interest on your debt outgrows what your collateral earns, governance cuts a liquidation threshold, a stablecoin you supplied as collateral slips below $1, or an oracle is misconfigured. Below 1.00, the position can be liquidated.

Applies to Aave V3.7, checked on the Ethereum Core, Arbitrum, Base, Optimism, Polygon, Avalanche and Gnosis markets. Other V3 markets and networks may run older versions. Aave V4 differences are noted where rules differ. Figures as of .

Why does the Aave health factor change on its own?

The Aave health factor changes on its own because it is not stored: the protocol recomputes it from current oracle prices, balances (including accrued interest) and risk parameters every time it is read:

HF = Σ(collateral value × liquidation threshold) ÷ total debt value

Both sides are in USD at the Aave oracle price, and below 1.00 the position can be liquidated. The formula is explained in what the Aave health factor is. On Aave V3, six things lower it without any action from you. The examples use Ethereum Core parameters read on 14 Oct 2026 and an illustrative ETH price of $2,400.

CauseLowers your health factor whenHow fastExample
1. Collateral price fallsAn asset you supplied as collateral drops in priceAs fast as the market10 WETH against 12,000 USDC, ETH down 10%: 1.66 to 1.49
2. Borrowed asset risesYou borrowed a volatile asset and it goes upAs fast as the market10,000 USDC against 2.5 WETH, ETH up 10%: 1.30 to 1.18
3. InterestYour debt's borrow rate is above your collateral's supply rateSlow and continuous10 WETH against 12,000 USDC: about 1.66 to 1.61 in a year
4. Liquidation threshold cutGovernance or the Risk Stewards lower your collateral's thresholdAll at onceHypothetical WETH cut from 83% to 82%: 1.66 to 1.64
5. Stablecoin depegA stablecoin you supplied as collateral falls below $1As fast as the market10,000 USDC against 2.5 WETH, USDC at $0.88: 1.30 to 1.14
6. Oracle or exchange-rate errorThe oracle values your collateral too low or your debt too highAll at onceMarch 2026: wstETH valued about 2.85% too low

Scroll sideways to see every column.

In a February 2025 Aave governance forum thread, a borrower whose position started at a health factor of 1.71 found a partial liquidation, added collateral when the health factor reached 1.01, and found a second liquidation when checking in the morning, sure that ETH had not fallen far enough to explain either. Nobody in the thread found the cause; the six causes below are where to start looking.

Aave V4, live on Ethereum since 30 March 2026 and since then on Avalanche, Arc and Base, computes a health factor per Spoke, with one collateral factor per asset. Prices and interest move it the same way, but parameter changes reach existing positions differently (see how V4 applies parameter changes, under Cause 4).

Cause 1: Did your collateral's price fall?

A fall in the price of any asset you supplied as collateral lowers your Aave health factor, because collateral is valued at the oracle price. With one volatile collateral asset and stablecoin debt, the health factor moves in proportion to the price: a 10% fall cuts it by 10%.

Take 10 WETH supplied against 12,000 USDC borrowed on Aave V3 Ethereum Core, where WETH's liquidation threshold was 83% at block 26193284 (14 Oct 2026). At an illustrative $2,400 per ETH (the Aave oracle read $2,414.78 at block 26193376 that day), the health factor is 24,000 × 0.83 ÷ 12,000 = 1.66. At $2,160 it is 1.49, at $1,920 it is 1.33, and at $1,445.78, a 39.8% fall, it reaches 1.00.

With several collateral assets, only the falling asset's weighted share moves. The price that counts is the Aave oracle's (on Ethereum Core, WETH uses a feed named "ETH / USD"). How far prices can fall at each health factor is in how much buffer a health factor gives you.

Cause 2: Did the price of the asset you borrowed rise?

If you borrowed a volatile asset, a rise in its price lowers your Aave health factor, because debt is valued at the oracle price too.

Take 10,000 USDC supplied against 2.5 WETH borrowed on Aave V3 Ethereum Core, where USDC's liquidation threshold was 78% at block 26193284 (14 Oct 2026). At an illustrative $2,400 the debt is worth $6,000 and the health factor is 10,000 × 0.78 ÷ 6,000 = 1.30. If ETH rises 10% to $2,640, it falls to 7,800 ÷ 6,600 = 1.18. At $3,120, 30% higher, it reaches 1.00.

Correlated pairs such as wstETH collateral with WETH debt reduce this effect, because both sides move with ETH. The health factor then depends mainly on the wstETH-to-ETH rate the oracle reports, which swaps market risk for oracle risk (see oracle and exchange-rate errors, Cause 6).

Cause 3: Did interest accrue on your debt faster than on your collateral?

Interest lowers your Aave health factor when your debt grows faster than your collateral. Variable debt grows every second at the borrow rate, while collateral earns the usually lower supply rate. With one collateral asset, one debt asset and steady prices, the health factor drifts down when the debt's borrow rate is above the collateral's supply rate, and up when it is below.

On Aave V3 Ethereum Core at block 26193378 (14 Oct 2026), USDC paid suppliers 3.800% and cost borrowers 4.496% a year; WETH paid 1.309% and cost 1.943%. These are APRs; the Aave app shows slightly higher APYs (4.60% for that USDC borrow rate). Take 10 WETH supplied (threshold 83%) against 12,000 USDC borrowed, with ETH flat at an illustrative $2,400 and rates unchanged for a year. The debt grows to about 12,550 USDC, the collateral to about 10.13 WETH, and the health factor slides from 1.66 to about 1.61. Rates are variable, so read that as scale, not a forecast.

Rates can also jump. Later on 14 Oct 2026, the Ethereum Core USDC borrow rate rose to 13.67% APR in a single block (26194053, 23:32:59 UTC) as about $134M of supplied USDC left the reserve, then fell back to 4.76% about 36 minutes later (block 26194231, 00:08 UTC on 15 Oct) when it returned.

The reverse position gains: 10,000 USDC supplied against 2.5 WETH borrowed earns 3.800% and pays 1.943%, so its health factor creeps from 1.30 to about 1.32 in a year. On Aave V4, a User Risk Premium adds to the borrow rate for riskier collateral, so that debt grows faster.

Cause 4: Did governance or the Risk Stewards cut a liquidation threshold?

On Aave V3, cutting an asset's liquidation threshold immediately lowers the health factor of every open position that counts that asset at its normal threshold. Positions whose E-Mode category includes the asset use the category's threshold instead, and governance or the Risk Stewards can cut that one the same way. Your balances stay the same; only the share of collateral that counts shrinks.

Governance changes thresholds by on-chain vote, usually after a post on the Aave governance forum. The Risk Stewards, contracts that let Aave's risk service providers adjust parameters without a full vote, can also move a threshold within set limits per update, but never to 0. Cuts also retire assets: a LlamaRisk proposal of 29 July 2026 says thresholds can be reduced gradually to remove lingering collateral.

A hypothetical example, not a pending change: 10 WETH at an illustrative $2,400 against 12,000 USDC on Ethereum Core (WETH threshold 83% on 14 Oct 2026) has a health factor of 1.66. At 82% it would be 1.64; at 80%, 1.60. To check, compare the "Liquidation threshold" on the asset's page in the Aave app with recent threshold changes on the Aave governance forum.

Aave V4 works differently. A collateral factor change creates a new configuration, and existing positions keep the old one until the user borrows, withdraws or changes collateral settings, unless the Governor force-updates them.

Cause 5: Did a stablecoin you supplied as collateral depeg downward?

A stablecoin you supplied as collateral lowers your Aave health factor when its price falls below $1, because Aave uses the oracle price, not a fixed $1. On Aave V3 Ethereum Core, USDC is priced through an adapter named "Capped USDC / USD" with a $1.04 cap (getPriceCap returned 104000000, 8 decimals, at blocks 26193376 and 26193993 on 14 Oct 2026). When the market price is above the cap, the adapter reports $1.04; any lower price, including anything below $1, passes straight through.

Take 10,000 USDC supplied (threshold 78%) against 2.5 WETH borrowed at an illustrative $2,400, so $6,000 of debt: a health factor of 1.30. With USDC at $0.88 it drops to 8,800 × 0.78 ÷ 6,000 = 1.14, and at about $0.77, with ETH unchanged, it reaches 1.00.

The $0.88 figure is historical. On 11 March 2023, after the Silicon Valley Bank news, USDC fell to around 88 cents. Gauntlet's post-mortem records about $280,000 of bad debt on Aave V3 Avalanche E-Mode and about $20,000 on V3 Arbitrum; stablecoins on Avalanche were frozen, but the protocol was not paused, so liquidations continued.

The flip side: if the stablecoin is your debt, a downward depeg lowers what you owe and raises your health factor. 10 WETH at $2,400 (threshold 83%) against 12,000 USDC goes from 1.66 to about 1.89 with USDC at $0.88. A rise above $1 lowers it, but only to about 1.60 while the cap stays at $1.04, because the oracle never values that debt above $12,480.

Cause 6: Did an oracle or exchange-rate error misprice your collateral?

An oracle or exchange-rate misconfiguration can lower your Aave health factor all at once, with no market move, by valuing your collateral too low or your debt too high. Tightly levered E-Mode positions are the most exposed.

The documented case is from March 2026. Aave prices wstETH with CAPO (Correlated Assets Price Oracle), which caps how fast the wstETH-to-stETH rate may rise. Chaos Labs' post-mortem of 10 March 2026 says the cap's snapshot ratio and timestamp fell out of sync, cutting the effective wstETH rate by about 2.85% on Ethereum Core and Prime. Roughly 10,938 wstETH was liquidated in E-Mode across 34 accounts with health factors below about 1.0288, with no bad debt to the protocol. The DAO approved a refund proposed on 11 March, and on 26 March 2026 the Aave Finance Committee drew 513.19 WETH from the Aave treasury to pay it (Ethereum block 24741060); individual payouts were not checked for this guide.

For scale, Ethereum Core's ETH-correlated E-Mode had an LTV of 93% and a threshold of 95% on 14 Oct 2026. A position borrowed to that limit starts at 95 ÷ 93 ≈ 1.02, inside the range that error liquidated. Nothing in your own position warns you of an oracle error; distance from 1.00 is the only buffer you control.

Which changes do not lower your health factor?

On Aave V3, an LTV cut (including LTV 0), a reserve freeze, a reserve pause and switching an E-Mode category to isolated do not change your health factor, because none of them changes prices, balances or liquidation thresholds. They block borrowing or other actions instead.

Change on Aave V3What it blocksChanges your health factor?Can you still be liquidated?
LTV cut, including LTV 0New borrowing against that assetNo: the health factor uses the threshold, not LTVYes, below 1.00
Reserve frozenNew supply and borrowing of that assetNoYes, frozen reserves stay liquidatable
E-Mode category made isolated (V3.7)Borrowing against collateral outside the categoryNo: that collateral gets LTV 0 and keeps its thresholdYes, below 1.00
Reserve pausedSupplying, withdrawing, borrowing, repaying and liquidating that assetNoNot with that asset, as collateral or debt, while it is paused; other assets still can be. Up to 4 hours of grace can follow an unpause

Scroll sideways to see every column.

A real case of the first row: after the 18 April 2026 Kelp/LayerZero rsETH bridge exploit, WETH's LTV was set to 0 on several Aave V3 instances while its threshold stayed at 83% on Ethereum Core, according to LlamaRisk's 9 May 2026 proposal to restore it. Health factors did not move because of it.

How can you find out what happened to your position?

To find out what happened to an Aave position, check whether it was liquidated, then which input moved: prices, interest, thresholds or the oracle. These steps use the Aave Labs interface at app.aave.com and public governance records.

  1. Check for liquidations. Open Transaction history (app.aave.com/history) with your wallet connected and the right market selected, then filter by Liquidation. The records behind it include the time, transaction hash, collateral taken and debt repaid; developers can query them with userTransactionHistory in Aave's API.
  2. Compare prices of your collateral and debt assets with when you last checked (Causes 1, 2 and 5).
  3. Compare your debt, in token units, with what you borrowed. If you made no repayments and were not liquidated, the difference is accrued interest (Cause 3).
  4. Check the liquidation threshold on each asset's page in the Aave app, and search the governance forum for any asset whose threshold looks lower (Cause 4).
  5. Look for incident post-mortems on the governance forum, like the March 2026 wstETH one (Cause 6).

If you were liquidated, what happens in an Aave liquidation explains how much can be taken at once and what it costs.

Can a health factor alert warn you before liquidation?

An alert can warn you in time about a slow fall in your Aave health factor, but not about a jump that crosses 1.00 between two checks. Interest, gradual price slides and staged threshold cuts play out over hours to months, so an alert set well above 1.00 has many chances to fire. A crash, a threshold cut on a position already near the line, or an oracle error like the March 2026 wstETH one can get past 1.00 before any scheduled check reacts.

Tokenping is built for the slow kind. It checks your Aave V3 and V4 health factor every 5 minutes on 22 networks and messages you on Signal, Telegram or email while it is below the threshold you set (1.1 to 10). The message repeats on every check until the health factor recovers, or you lower the threshold below it or delete the alert (both need active paid access), with no "recovered" message. On Aave V3 it covers every market, Ethereum's four included; on Aave V4 every Spoke; each market has its own alert.

An alert also needs time to act on. In a 2021 Polygon forum thread, a borrower who tried to repay at a health factor of 1.01 kept hitting errors and was liquidated before the repayment went through. One option is a threshold where you would still be comfortable acting; how much buffer a health factor gives you helps you choose it. Setup is in how to set up a health factor alert, and how to raise your Aave health factor covers what to do when it falls. You can also check your Aave V3 health factor first.

Sources

Educational content, not financial advice. Alerts reduce risk; they do not prevent liquidation.

Tokenping is in betaFollow us on

Aave V3 and V4 health factor alerts on Signal, Telegram and email.

romispectrum.ethDonation address: 0x4f57c97f76E8d1C889eaA74A02E150BE1e0EDe25

Independent tool, not affiliated with Aave Labs or the Aave DAO.

Theme